How to build a company immigration policy for HR and employers
11 mins read | Jul 21, 2026
WHAT TO FILE TO OPEN A US BRANCH
Contributor
Tukki
Reading time
10 mins read
Date published
Jun 15, 2026
The L-1A visa new office route lets a company with no U.S. operations yet send one of its own executives or managers to open and run a U.S. branch. If you own the decision to expand into the United States, you're likely the HR, global mobility, or immigration specialist who will run the filing, gather the evidence, and keep the timeline honest. This guide is that operational playbook: who the route fits, the full checklist for opening a US branch, the investment question everyone gets wrong, the one-year clock you're filing against, and what it costs. A branch opening runs through the people responsible for compliance and filings, so we've built this as the workflow that team works from, with the transferring executive getting their own direct line to attorneys for their personal documents.
This covers opening a new U.S. office on the L-1A. If your company already runs an established U.S. entity, or you're weighing a treaty-investor route instead, those are different filings and we'll point you to them along the way.
The L-1A new office route is a version of the L-1A intracompany transfer built for a multinational company that wants to set up its first U.S. office and move an executive or manager over to lead it. The standard L-1A assumes you already have a running U.S. entity to transfer someone into, while the new office variation handles the harder case: the U.S. company exists on paper or is brand new, isn't doing business yet, and needs its senior leader on the ground to stand it up. Because there's no operating U.S. office to point to, USCIS approves the petition for a shorter initial window and asks you to prove the office is real and ready to grow.
That distinction shapes everything that follows: a new office case is judged on what you've secured and planned, not on revenue you can't have yet, which is why the evidence you assemble before filing carries so much weight.
The L-1A new office visa fits a company abroad that's ready to commit to a real U.S. operation and has a senior person to run it. The clearest sign you're in new-office territory is that your U.S. entity has been doing business for less than a year, or hasn't started at all. You need a qualifying corporate relationship between the foreign and U.S. entities, a transferee who has spent at least one continuous year in the last three working abroad as a manager or executive, and the funding and premises to back a genuine office rather than a placeholder.
This is an organizational decision, not a solo founder act. The HR or immigration specialist manages the petition and the evidence trail, while the executive who's relocating works directly with attorneys on their own background, prior-role description, and personal documents. Keeping those two channels separate, rather than routing everything through one person, is what keeps a branch opening from stalling.
The qualifying relationship is the corporate link between your foreign company and the new U.S. entity, and it's the first thing USCIS checks. The U.S. and foreign businesses must be tied as parent, branch, subsidiary, or affiliate, and that tie has to be documented with articles of incorporation, stock certificates, and organizational charts that show common ownership or control. Without it, there's no L-1A to file, no matter how strong the rest of the case looks.
One condition that catches companies off guard: the foreign entity has to keep doing business abroad the entire time the U.S. office operates. The L-1A is built on the idea of a transfer between two active arms of the same enterprise, so if the foreign operation winds down, the basis for the visa weakens. For the broad eligibility picture and how the intracompany transfer works overall, our L-1A visa guide is the pillar resource to read alongside this checklist.
Here's the scannable checklist for opening a US branch on the L-1A new office route, grouped by phase. Treat it as your working document: the items before you file are the ones USCIS weighs most heavily, and the sections after this expand the high-stakes pieces. Save or print the phase-grouped graphic below so the whole team works from the same list.
Before you file
The petition
First year in the US
Looking ahead

There is no minimum investment for an L-1 new office visa. This is the single most-misunderstood point on the entire route, and it's usually the reason people search for a "recommended" or "minimum" investment figure that doesn't exist. The L-1 has no statutory dollar threshold, so any specific number you see quoted as a requirement is invented. What USCIS does require is proof that the U.S. entity is funded well enough to begin doing business and to support a real managerial or executive role within the first year. That's a question of evidence and credibility, not a number you hit.
The confusion almost always comes from mixing up the L-1 with the E-2 treaty investor visa, which is a genuinely different animal. Sorting out which one you're actually looking at clears up most of the anxiety around this question.
The L-1 and the E-2 answer different questions, which is why one has an investment test and the other doesn't. The E-2 is an investor visa: it's open to nationals of treaty countries who put a substantial amount of their own capital at risk in a U.S. business, and the size and proportionality of that investment is the heart of the case, with no corporate-relationship requirement at all. The L-1 is a transfer visa: it's open to a qualifying multinational moving its own executive or manager, so the case turns on the corporate relationship and the person's managerial history, while capitalization is judged as "enough to operate," not "enough to clear a bar."
That difference matters for planning. The L-1A has no treaty-country restriction and no fixed investment figure, while the E-2 has both but offers indefinite renewals for as long as the business runs. If the investor-visa path is genuinely the better fit for your expansion, our L-1 vs E-2 visa comparison lays out when each one is the right call so you can decide with the full picture.
Instead of a dollar figure, USCIS wants concrete proof that the new office is real and built to grow. The strongest new-office petitions show three things clearly: secured physical premises, enough funding to operate, and a credible plan for the executive or managerial role to be fully occupied as the office scales. The premises piece is firm. You need a signed lease or equivalent for space large enough to hold the planned operation, secured before you file, not promised for later.
On funding, you're showing capacity to begin doing business and carry payroll, not proving a net worth: bank statements, investment records, and funding documents from the foreign entity all speak to this. The business plan ties it together by projecting staffing and revenue over the first years and showing how the role grows from setup into genuine executive leadership. USCIS reads these together to answer one question: will this office actually be doing business, with a real manager or executive at the top, within a year? You can confirm the agency's own framing on the USCIS L-1A page.
A new office L-1 petition is approved for an initial period of up to one year, shorter than the standard L-1A's three-year grant, because USCIS is giving the office time to prove it can stand on its own. That one-year window is the defining feature of the route, and everything you do in those twelve months is, in effect, the case for your extension. This is where new office cases are won or lost: the initial approval is a vote of confidence in your plan, while the extension is judged on results, so treating year one as a runway to generate proof, rather than a grace period, separates an approved extension from a denied one.
In the first year, the job is to turn the plan into an operating business: hire staff, open accounts, sign contracts, and start delivering goods or services. "Doing business" in USCIS terms means the regular, continuous provision of goods or services, so activity on paper isn't enough. The executive should be moving from hands-on setup toward genuine managerial or executive work as the team grows beneath them, because the whole premise of the L-1A is that the role is leadership, not day-to-day operations.
Keep evidence as you go, since you'll need it sooner than it feels: payroll records, signed client contracts, invoices, bank activity, and an updated org chart showing real hires all build the file you'll submit at extension time. Treat record-keeping as an ongoing task from week one rather than a scramble in month eleven.
The extension is where USCIS checks whether the new office delivered on its plan, and it requires proof that the office is actually doing business and now supports a true managerial or executive role. After the initial year, you file to extend, and the agency reviews growth closely: if staffing, revenue, or client acquisition fell short of the projections, an examiner can deny the extension on the grounds that the role isn't genuinely executive or managerial. Heavy scrutiny at this stage is normal, so the cleaner your evidence, the smoother the renewal.
Once you're past it, extensions come in increments up to the L-1A's seven-year total, and the executive can hold L-1A status for that full run. If permanent residence is part of the plan, the extension is often the moment to start the green card filing in parallel, since the I-140 immigrant petition can run alongside continued L-1A status. Our L-1A visa extension guide walks through the after-year-one renewal and how the I-140 fits in.
The core government cost of an L-1A new office petition is the Form I-129 filing fee plus the L supplement, with premium processing as an optional add-on. Premium processing costs $2,965 and guarantees that USCIS acts within 15 business days, a fee that took effect March 1, 2026. It's the right call when a relocation date is locked in, a lease is already running and burning money, or business planning depends on a firm answer soon. When your timeline has slack and regular processing fits the calendar, many companies skip it and put the money toward standing up the office.
Beyond filing fees, budget for attorney support to build the new-office evidence package, the lease and capitalization you've committed to, and the executive's relocation. The HR or immigration specialist manages the filing budget and the org-level paperwork, while the transferring executive works directly with attorneys on their personal documents, so the cost picture has two distinct sides. For a full per-fee breakdown across L-1A cases, see our L-1A processing time and fees guide, and for the wider budgeting picture across work visas, our guide to U.S. work visa costs. The petition mechanics themselves are covered in our Form I-129 guide.
The L-1A new office route has a built-in path to permanent residence through the EB-1C green card, the immigrant category for multinational managers and executives. The two categories share much of the same DNA: both ask for a qualifying corporate relationship and a genuine executive or managerial role, so the evidence you build to run the U.S. branch is largely the same evidence an EB-1C petition needs, which makes the L-1A one of the more direct work-visa-to-green-card routes available.
Timing is the thing to plan early. By the time you're filing the first extension, the U.S. office should be operating and the role clearly executive, which is exactly the profile EB-1C wants to see, so mapping the green card filing during year one rather than year six keeps the seven-year L-1A limit from becoming a constraint. The executive coordinates their EB-1C petition directly with attorneys, while HR keeps the corporate evidence and timeline visible at the org level. Our L-1A to green card guide walks through how the EB-1C pathway works and what to expect.
Tukki is a U.S. immigration provider that helps companies and their executives with work visas and green cards, from L-1A intracompany transfers and the EB-1C path to H-1B and O-1A. Your HR or mobility team gets full visibility across the branch-opening filing and every deadline, while the transferring executive gets dedicated attorney support for their own case.
WE CAN HELP
Need more clarity?
Find quick answers to frequent visa questions from our legal experts
Can my spouse work in the U.S. on an L-2 visa?
Yes. L-2 spouses receive employment authorization incident to their status. CBP issues an I-94 with an "L-2S" designation, which serves as proof of work authorization. A separate EAD is not required, though some L-2 spouses apply for one anyway. This makes the L-2 one of the more generous dependent visa categories for spousal employment.
Can I use a blanket petition for someone already in the United States?
No. Blanket petition beneficiaries must go through consular adjudication at a U.S. consulate abroad, which means they need to attend an in-person L-1 visa interview outside the United States.
If your employee is already in the U.S. and you want to avoid international travel, you'll need to file an individual petition on Form I-129 with USCIS.
Is the L-1A always the better choice if the employee qualifies for both?
In most cases, yes.
The L-1A offers two extra years of maximum stay and access to the EB-1C green card pathway, which skips PERM labor certification.
However, the petition must accurately reflect the role.
Filing an L-1A for a role that does not meet the managerial or executive standard risks a denial and delays the transfer.
If the role is genuinely a specialized knowledge position, the L-1B is the correct and stronger filing.
Can a nonprofit organization file a blanket L-1 petition?
No. Blanket petitions are only available to organizations engaged in commercial trade or services.
Nonprofits, religious organizations, and other noncommercial entities must use the individual petition route for L-1A transfers, even if they meet the other size and volume requirements.
Is the L-1 blanket visa success rate lower than individual petitions?
There's no published data comparing blanket and individual visa approval rates directly.
Consular officers adjudicating blanket beneficiaries can sometimes apply stricter scrutiny to the individual's role.
Well-prepared cases with clear managerial documentation typically do well.
The key is providing strong organizational charts and detailed role descriptions that distinguish the position from hands-on technical work.
Other blogs for every step of your visa journey