EB-1A processing time - how long does it take?
7 mins read | Jan 29, 2026
HOW USCIS EVALUATES EB-1A PETITIONS
Contributor
Tukki
Reading time
10 mins read
Date published
Jan 27, 2026
EB-1A refers to the employment-based first-preference green card for individuals with extraordinary ability. According to the U.S Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), foreign nationals who excel in fields like arts, sciences, education, business, or athletics are eligible.
This visa allows you to apply for permanent residence within the United States of America if you can prove you're among the small, elite percentage in your field. Also, the EB-1A visa does not require an employer or employment offer. That means you can file the petition yourself.
In this article, we’ll break down the eligibility criteria, explain how to strengthen your application under each requirement, and share practical tips to improve your chances of approval.
The EB-1A visa is for individuals who are distinguished in their field. Eligible candidates come from disciplines like arts, science, education, business, athletics and technology.
Applicants do not need a job offer or employer sponsorship, and you can self-petition. What's most important is having a record to attest to your prowess in these areas.
To qualify for the EB-1A green card, you must demonstrate extraordinary ability through one of two paths.
Check if you qualify for the EB-1A Visa
The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services outlines 10 EB-1A eligibility criteria. They include critical role, high remuneration, awards, judging, membership, original contributions, scholarly articles, published materials, displayed work, and commercial success.
Let’s explain what each criterion means and how to use it to build a strong application.
There are 2 things you should keep in mind for this EB-1A criterion.
First, your role must be relevant to the organization’s operations. Think that what matters is the level of impact your work had on achieving the organization’s goals, not your title or seniority in itself.
Second, the organization must have a distinguished reputation. This is often easier to show for large, internationally recognized companies like Google or Meta, but size alone is not determinative.
Reputation can be demonstrated through:
Documentation: Proof of roles, documents detailing your work performance and success, letter of recommendation from your organization and proof of employment, and proof of organization’s status.
Tips for success: The letter of recommendation should come from someone who has managed you directly, in a higher position. Their vote of confidence holds more weight than a VP who barely knows your day-to-day workflow.
Your salary should be in the top 10% of your profession and above the benchmark set by the Department of Labor if you’re in the US.
USCIS considers whether you have earned a high salary or other significant compensation compared to others in your field. This includes base salary, bonuses, stock options, equity, or any other form of remuneration.
Suppose you live and work outside the US. You can compare your salary with those of similar professionals in your local and national areas to determine whether you're in the 10%.
Documentation: You should submit pay stubs for at least the last 6 months, a W-2 form if applicable, a recently issued offer letter containing your salary, and a bank statement to confirm the salary actually lands in your account.
You can also include employment contracts and related offer letters showing your salary, third-party wage data, or salary surveys for your occupation, valuation or documentation of stock/equity holdings.
Tips for success: Support claims with third-party salary data that places you clearly above industry norms.
This criterion covers nationally or internationally recognized awards for excellence in your field. Here,USCIS considers whether the person was a recipient of prizes or awards. A team award may qualify if the person was one of the recipients. The USCIS also considers whether the award is a lesser nationally or internationally recognized award for excellence in the field.
A qualifying award may come from well-known national institutions or professional associations, doctoral dissertation awards or awards for presentations at recognized conferences.
Documentation: Includes award certificates, profiles of the organizers of the award or funding event, official announcements, selection guidelines, reputation of granting bodies, and media coverage.
Tips for success: Provide third-party evidence, like media coverage, and press releases. You should also include details about eligibility, number of recipients, and statements showing the significance of the award, and the importance of your contribution (where the award is team-based).
Judging is considered as proof of peer trust in your expertise and experience. Hackathons, peer reviews, paper reviews, startup pitch evaluations, and judging competitions are all good evidence.
Documentation: Invitation to serve as a judge, email acknowledgements after the event, certificate or official records of judging, a direct letter from the organization confirming your role, and scorecards are useful. Future judging is not an eligible piece of evidence.
Tips for success: Emphasize selectivity, frequency, and the institution’s authority in appointing you.
Membership must be based on your excellence within your field of expertise and be highly selective. For the selection process, your entry should involve expert evaluation, peer nomination, or a competitive review. And the organization issuing membership must limit it to top professionals.
Documentation: Official membership certificates or letters, admission criteria showing selectivity, and bylaws or public descriptions of the evaluation process. There should also be evidence of peer or expert review during admission and member activity after admission.
Tips for success: You don’t need too many memberships. Pick a few important ones and actively participate in them.

Original contributions are one of the strongest and most scrutinized criteria. They must demonstrate the impact of your work in the industry, not just within your company.
Documentation: Public adoption evidence or contracts, citation records depicting how your research paper has impacted others, and testimonials from companies using your open source code.
Tips for success: Focus on work that solves clear industry problems and can grow or draw wide notice. Partner with credible institutions, document impact over time, share results through conferences and contribute to open source spaces where others can rely on your work.
The scholarly articles are a way to show your thought leadership and intellectual contribution to the field. This can include peer-reviewed scientific journal papers, conference proceedings, and technical publications on major research outlets
Documentation: Evidence of scholarly articles, proof of peer-review or editorial standards, and information about the publication’s reputation.
Tips for success: write articles that show clear expertise and original thoughts, recognition from peers. Support this with numbers such as citation counts or impact factors, explain what the article adds to the field and show the reliance of others on it.
Published materials are publications written about you but not by you. This differentiates it from scholarly articles. Also, the articles need to appear in a major media or publication outlet not controlled by you or your organization.
Documentation: Full copies of the published material with screenshots, publication details, and circulation, third-party statistics, and a letter from the outlet if needed. There should also be proof of independence from you or your employer and a clear identification of you as the subject.
Tips for success: To show the major trade, aim for those with at least 500,000 monthly views.
This criterion applies mainly to artists and requires evidence that your creative work has been shown to the public, either online or in physical spaces.
Documentation: Photos of you at the venue with your work, screenshots of online features, press features, confirmation from the exhibiting organization, evidence of public recognition, evidence of ownership of work, and audience data.
Tips for success: Prioritize platforms and exhibitions with documented audience or critical attention. Provide evidence to show each display should reflect recognition, selectivity, and critical attention, but none of these are a must.
This relates to performers, musicians, filmmakers, and other artists whose creative work has achieved measurable financial success.
Documentation: Box office tallies, or gross revenue statements, music streaming or download statistics, sales reports for albums, books, or performance, independent chart rankings, press coverage or industry reports documenting commercial success, distributor or venue statements verifying your impact on performance turnout.
Tips for success: Relative success boosts your application. Specify how your art ranks top three or ten on the crowded chart, top gross income or box office sales, and peak streaming numbers compared to others’ works.
USCIS uses a two-step process when reviewing EB-1A petitions. Many applicants focus only on the criteria and underestimate the importance of the second step.
Either you have a major, internationally recognized award, such as the Oscar, the Pulitzer, or an Olympic Medal. Or you meet at least 3 of the 10 EB-1A eligibility criteria listed above. For best results, aim for at least 5 of the 10 eligibility criteria.
The immigration office checks how relevant and significant each criterion you checked is. For example, you may have three original contributions, but how many, and how much impact do they have within your field or industry compared to peers?
Before starting, you can get a clearer, profile-based view of which visa may be a better fit right now with our Visa Match tool. If the EB-1A visa remains your best option, you can speak directly with us to help prepare next steps.
WE CAN HELP
Need more clarity?
Find quick answers to frequent visa questions from our legal experts
How important is peer-reviewed research in EB-1A or EB-2 NIW cases?
It depends. For scientists and academics, publications in peer-reviewed journals are often a cornerstone of the case. For professionals in business, arts, or other industries, other types of evidence (press, awards, leadership, impact) may carry more weight.
What’s the difference between “extraordinary ability” and “exceptional ability”?
Extraordinary ability is the language you must use in O-1 and EB-1A cases, and it means you are among the very top in your field. Exceptional ability (EB-2 NIW wording) means you have expertise significantly above the average but not necessarily at the very top.
How much documentation do I need to file a visa petition for an EB-1A or O-1A visa?
In US immigration processes, your claims must be more likely than not to be true. This means if something appears more true than false, USCIS should accept it as true. To meet this standard, the visa petitioner should provide documents that convincingly support the claim’s validity.
For instance, to prove you received VC funding, you could provide signed SAFE agreements with a VC, a published article about your funding round, and documentation about the relevance of the VC.
Keep in mind that theory and practice do not always perfectly align. It’s crucial you speak to an experienced legal team to avoid spending time and money on documentation that does not support your case.
Can I apply for both O-1A and EB-1A at the same time?
Yes, and many people do.
A common strategy is to file for O-1A to enter the U.S. quickly while an EB-1A petition is pending or while you continue building your profile. However, because O-1A is technically a non-immigrant visa, having immigrant intent requires careful planning.
This approach is allowed, but it’s important to understand the legal implications and structure the filings correctly.
Is it possible to re-apply to the USCIS if your application to the O-1A or EB-1A visas is rejected?
Yes, you can reapply as many times as you wish.
However, bear in mind that when you submit a green card petition or it’s submitted on your behalf, immigration authorities may sometimes see this as an indication that you plan to live in the US permanently (immigrant intent). This is incompatible with a key requirement for most temporary visas, which must express an intent to relocate to the US temporarily only.
If you plan to, or need to file a temporary visa application after filing an EB-1A application, this may affect your eligibility to renew or obtain your temporary visa.
Rules around resubmissions are nuanced, so it is advisable to consult with an experienced immigration attorney to understand all the implications.
Other blogs for every step of your visa journey