Do I need an immigration lawyer? When to DIY vs hire one
9 mins read | May 19, 2026
US IMMIGRATION, BUT SIMPLE.
Contributor
Nadine Heir
Reading time
8 mins read
Date published
Jun 30, 2024
Tap into the wealth of experience and unique perspective that having previously worked as a McKinsey consultant and an orchestra conductor brings to this story. In this exclusive Q&A, Ramiro Roballos, CEO of Tukki, delves into the pivotal moments and motivations that led him to create the groundbreaking platform turning the US immigration process into a premium experience.
Drawing from his own challenging experiences with immigration and his passion for technology, Ramiro shares the journey from his initial "Eureka" moment to winning a Hackathon in Austin and partnering with former colleagues to build a solution that addresses the real pain points of migrants.
This in-depth conversation reveals not only the origins of Tukki but also the mission-driven approach that continues to shape its development and impact following Ramiro’s interview with me, your line into Tukki's secrets, Nadine Heir.

Q: Where did the “Tukki Eureka” moment come from?
A: I’d been working at McKinsey in Miami before, a truly consuming job where I learned an immense amount, fed my MBA experience, and flexed my business muscles. I had an itch to start something of my own though, to learn how to code, and get back to leading something bigger than me — like I did as an orchestra conductor and at my music school in Argentina — and knew I couldn’t do that while working as a consultant.
So I took the plunge, I left the company with no plan B. I was saying “yes” to all the potential ideas and adventures that crossed my path. I had continued studying programming on weekends and in May of 2023, I went to a Techstars Hackathon in Austin to present myself as a programmer, not a McKinsey consultant for the first time.

So you see, I already had this idea in mind. I knew there was a gap in the market because I’d been through the literal nightmare that was US immigration in the most traditional sense. It’s so old school and has not advanced at the rate of other industries that grow technology. I was ready to change that.
Q: Did the Hackathon reveal demand in the market for your idea?
A: In short, yes. Perhaps it was a sign that another group of programmers wanted to do something similar. We teamed up and pitched an AI-driven solution to immigration headaches and, out of around 30 teams, we won!
I took this as a sign that the idea was more than valid. I was already talking to an old colleague from McKinsey, Saviley Vasilev, and essentially we decided to become partners, and founded Tukki.
Q: So tell us, what convinced you and your co-founder to join forces on this mission?
A: The initial idea was to create a platform that would help lawyers. However, in-depth research revealed that lawyers weren’t struggling with the process as much — to a certain extent, it “worked” for them. But it didn’t work for migrants.
In my own experience, I’ve never been more frustrated with a process. I was super keen to achieve my green card in 2021 when I was still at McKinsey, so was never taking longer than a 24h to complete my tasks as they came to me. Every copy, every form I had to get hold of, I had it within a day. But the lawyers I worked with would take 7 to 10 days to respond at each step. Even my critical questions would receive a sort of canned response, late, and unspecific.
I lost 5 months of my life in the filing process.
Then, the government took another 18 months to give me a response.
Now, when I say I don’t think immigration should be this hard — you know I mean it. I felt completely alone in the process, fed up, and very ready to flip the process on its head.
By October 2023, I decided to incorporate Tukki with Saveliy Vasilev and supported by José De Wit, our legal advisor who leads a team of lawyers and paralegals. We married the technological expertise with legal structure to make a solution that people really need.

Q: How does Tukki fit into your own life plans and aspirations?
A: Bare minimum, I want to spend my life doing something that matters. It could be the most successful piece of technology, but whatever happens, I plan to enjoy this journey. And you know what, the feeling every time we achieve the “approved” notification for an applicant, and they leave the consulate in the green, that feeling is like no other.
If this interview inspired you, learn more about Ramiro by joining him on LinkedIn. And if you’re curious what the Tukki team’s been building, check out our visa match tool.
WE CAN HELP
Need more clarity?
Find quick answers to frequent visa questions from our legal experts
Do influencers need a U.S. employer to get an O-1 visa?
You can't self-petition, but you don't need a traditional employer. Every O-1 petition requires a U.S. employer, agent, or organization to file Form I-129 on your behalf.
For influencers who work with multiple brands and platforms, agent sponsorship is the most common structure. An agent files the petition and allows you to work across different projects and clients on a single visa.
What if I'm already in the US when the ban applies?
For Group 3 nationals, change of status and adjustment of status are generally still available under normal rules. For Group 1 and Group 2 nationals, that is no longer reliable: USCIS guidance issued in late 2025 directs officers to weigh travel-ban status on in-country filings, and a parallel policy pauses final adjudication of pending benefit requests for nationals of the 39 Proclamation 10998 countries.
The policy is being challenged in court. Talk to an attorney before filing.
Does an approved I-140 extend L-1A status beyond seven years?
No. Unlike the H-1B, where an approved I-140 enables three-year extensions beyond the six-year cap under AC21, there is no equivalent provision for the L-1A.
The seven-year maximum is a hard limit.
An I-140's value for L-1A holders is that it establishes your priority date and enables you to file I-485 when that date becomes current.
What is an RFE?
RFEs or Requests for Evidence is not a rejection or necessarily a bad sign.
The tone of the RFE can give you an idea of their level of doubt about your petition. The officer reviewing your case might be buying time during busy periods, for example, if they have to give you a response in 15 business days because you filed for premium processing and the workload is too high to process your case in time.
If the RFE includes questions about the factual sufficiency or legality of your case, it likely means they need more evidence or more explanations, or both, before approving the case. Neither of these cases signal an outright or even a likely rejection.
Other blogs for every step of your visa journey